Factors influencing people's ability to maintain their activity levels during treatment for soft tissue sarcoma - A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare connective tissue cancer treated with chemotherapy in the advanced stages. Emerging evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) improves symptom management and quality of life for people undergoing chemotherapy for advanced cancer. However, little research reports their perspective. Method: Semi-structured interviews were used within a phenomenological approach to explore factors that affect people's ability to be physically active while undergoing treatment. Six participants were recruited with purposive sampling. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Three themes identified that PA was seen as an indicator of a persons' own sense of normality; a feeling of loss and uncertainty for the future had impacts on peoples' ability to be physically active, and finally, participants found it challenging to recognize their support needs as their activity levels reduced. Motivation to remain active was individual, and numerous barriers affected participants' ability to remain active as their disease advanced; this included a lack of specific guidance while undergoing chemotherapy. Participants expressed uncertainty generally in identifying and expressing their support needs as they faced multiple complex issues. Conclusion: Health professionals should be proactive in exploring possibilities for PA to mitigate the expected physical decline, and support symptom management while undergoing palliative chemotherapy.

Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods.

OBJECTIVES: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) and care planning are proposed to address unmet needs of people treated for cancer. We tested whether HNA and care planning by an allied health professional improved cancer-specific quality of life for women following curative treatment for stage I-III gynaecological cancer. METHODS: Consecutive women were invited to participate in a randomised controlled study (HNA and care planning vs usual care) at a UK cancer centre. Data were collected by questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The outcomes were 6-month change in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (version 3), global score (primary) and, in EORTC subscales, generic quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary). The study was blinded for data management and analysis. Differences in outcomes were compared between groups. Health service utilisation and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) (from Short Form-6) were gathered for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data from an exit interview. RESULTS: 150 women consented (75 per group); 10 undertook interviews. For 124 participants (61 intervention, 63 controls) with complete data, no statistically significant differences were seen between groups in the primary endpoint. The majority of those interviewed reported important personal gains they attributed to the intervention, which reflected trends to improvement seen in EORTC functional and symptom scales. Economic analysis suggests a 62% probability of cost-effectiveness at a £30 000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: Care plan development with an allied health professional is cost-effective, acceptable and useful for some women treated for stage I-III gynaecological cancer. We recommend its introduction early in the pathway to support person-centred care.